UNI-T Thermal Imager
UNI-T UTi690A 120*90 Infrared Thermal Imager -20~400℃ PC Software Analysis Industrial Thermal Imaging Camera Handheld USB Infrared Thermometer
Questions and Answers
The uploaded software does not work, do you have a link for where I can download the PC software?
http://myosuploads3.banggood.com/products/20211126/20211126024919UTI690A.rar
where to download software for uti690a?
The uploaded software does not work. However the software for the UTi120B works great, you can find the software om Uni-T's website.
Reviews
BG014103836
on 13 November 2022
good product
BG411054345
on 01 October 2022
I’m impressed with everything about this product. Quality, ease of use, precision, how it fits the hand, how the design is safe for sensor, LED, laser, and LCD.
gmanos16
on 26 August 2022
This camera is amazing. At this price point i believe is the one with the highest ir resolution (dont confuse it with the screen resolution). Image comes at about 10 constant fps. They only downside is the lack of a normal camera, so there is not anything like combination mode, you only see a clear thermal image. It includes a micro sd and a charging cable. The packaging feels amazing. If you dont wanna spend a fortune in UTI690B, then I recommend this one for sure!
Dragos
on 26 August 2022
It was a little tricky to install it on PC to download the photos, anyway I be managed to do'it. Till now I didn't managed to make it live on PC but it's working and that's great...
bobuss
on 17 August 2022
Super quality product. Simple to use. Included in the set is a 16gb microsd card.
BG038363351
on 13 June 2022
It has arrived today, 6 months after the date of purchase, I know that it has not been a problem of the seller, so I give it 5 stars, but 6 months is a long time. Who gives me 5 stars for my patience
Blastar
on 03 May 2022
Quite decent quality. I really enjoyed it.
BG165318433
on 13 April 2022
Very pleased, fulfilled the promise, exactly as described. THANK YOU SO MUCH
mrisco
on 07 December 2021
Great device for the price, but it is more expensive than the UTi120S, after review both devices, seems to be the same. The menu system is responsive. Lacks the visible light camera that have more expensive devices, then you cannot mix normal images with thermal images. It is very easy to use and can be an excellent entry device and a replacement device for carry up when you can worry of carry a more expensive device.
ufosl85
on 06 December 2021
The build quality seem very decent for the price. At the top is a rubber cover that protects the USB-C port and SD-card slot. The UTi690A does not have a normal camera so you're completely dependent on the thermal image shown on the display. It does however have both a tiny flashlight and a laser pointer that help in low light situations and if you're completely unsure where you're pointing it at. The menu system feels very responsive and even if the unit have less buttons than most thermal imagers, it's very easy and quick to nagive through the settings. When it comes to what information can be displayed on the screen, the following options are available: Center Point measurement, Hi/Lo Point measurement, Palette, Date&Time. This is quite limited for some use, but for the price point it seem common with these options, and have the feeling that more advanced options may be too much for the processor to handle. For the use I purchased it for, to troubleshoot 3D-Printers it seem to work great. You can easilly see single wires when they heat up as current pass through them, and the measurement at the center point gives the same readings as my FLIR E30bx does. The work range does seem to be quite accurate, you seem to gain additional detail in the images down to a distance of ~10cm from the sensor. I checked if possible to identify PCB-components and did so quite easily down to a size of ~3mm, smaller components than that and you would need an additional ZnSe lens or similar. Overall, happy with the thermal imager for the price paid, it seems to read measurements accurately as my expensive Flir E30bx unit, resolution is just lower. For checking on 3D-printers and other objects of similar size it seems to work great.
